The True Cost of Manual AVD Management
“We’ll just manage it manually.”
It’s a common response when organisations evaluate scaling automation tools. The logic seems sound: why pay for a tool when someone on the team can handle scaling decisions?
But this calculation misses the true cost of manual management. Let’s break down what manual AVD management really costs — and it’s probably more than you think.
The Visible Costs
These are the costs everyone considers:
1. Time Spent on Scaling Decisions
Someone needs to:
- Monitor usage patterns
- Decide when to scale up/down
- Execute scaling changes
- Verify changes were successful
- Handle exceptions and issues
Conservative estimate: 30 minutes per day for a modest deployment.
Over a year, that’s 182 hours — more than four working weeks — spent on repetitive operational tasks.
2. Time Spent on Schedule Management
Before every holiday, someone needs to:
- Identify the holiday
- Determine impact on usage
- Adjust scaling schedules
- Remember to revert after the holiday
With 8-10 public holidays per year plus company closures, ad-hoc adjustments, and seasonal changes, this easily adds another 50+ hours annually.
3. Out-of-Hours Work
AVD doesn’t stop when your team goes home. Manual management means:
- Weekend monitoring (or accepting no weekend optimisation)
- Early morning scaling decisions
- Late night verifications
- On-call responsibilities
Even if this is just occasional, it impacts team morale and work-life balance.
The Hidden Costs
Here’s where manual management gets expensive:
1. Suboptimal Scaling Decisions
Humans can’t monitor systems 24/7. This leads to:
Slow scale-up: Users arrive at 9am, but nobody triggers scale-up until 9:15. For 15 minutes, users wait or get degraded performance.
Slow scale-down: The team goes home at 6pm, but nobody thinks to scale down until they check the next morning. That’s 15 hours of unnecessary capacity.
Missed opportunities: Nobody’s monitoring at 2am when usage drops to zero, so minimum capacity runs all night.
Quantified: Even a 10% inefficiency on a £10,000/month AVD deployment costs £12,000 per year.
2. Forgotten Holidays
Be honest: has your team ever forgotten to adjust scaling for a holiday?
It happens. People get busy. Holidays sneak up. Someone assumes someone else handled it.
Each forgotten holiday is a day of full capacity running for zero users.
Example: A 50-host deployment running on Christmas Day and Boxing Day when no one’s working. That’s 2 days × 50 hosts × 24 hours = 2,400 host-hours wasted.
At £0.10/host-hour, that’s £240 per incident. Miss a few holidays a year, and you’re looking at £1,000+ in unnecessary spend.
3. Single Points of Failure
Manual management typically means one person (maybe two) who “knows how AVD scaling works.”
What happens when they:
- Go on holiday?
- Get sick?
- Leave the organisation?
- Are simply unavailable?
Knowledge gaps lead to:
- Scaling not happening
- Wrong decisions made by unfamiliar staff
- Emergency situations requiring expensive escalation
4. Opportunity Cost
Those 200+ hours your team spends on manual AVD management? They could spend them on:
- Strategic projects
- User experience improvements
- Security enhancements
- Learning new skills
- Actually helping users
What’s the value of an IT professional’s time? At a loaded cost of £50-100/hour, manual management consumes £10,000-20,000 in opportunity cost annually.
5. Error Recovery
Manual processes mean manual errors:
- Scaling down when scaling up was intended
- Applying changes to the wrong host pool
- Forgetting to revert temporary changes
- Misconfiguring parameters
Each error requires:
- Time to identify the problem
- Time to fix it
- Potential impact on users
- Potential impact on costs
Conservative estimate: 20+ hours per year spent on error recovery.
6. Delayed Optimisation
Automated systems can react in seconds. Humans? Not so much.
When usage patterns change unexpectedly:
- Automated system: Detects change, adjusts scaling within minutes
- Manual process: Someone notices (eventually), decides what to do, implements change (could be hours or days)
During that delay, you’re either:
- Overpaying for unused capacity, or
- Underdelivering on user experience
7. Inconsistency
Manual decisions vary based on:
- Who’s making them
- What else is demanding their attention
- How much information they have
- Their personal risk tolerance
Automated systems make consistent decisions every time. Manual management introduces variability that’s hard to quantify but real.
The Total Cost
Let’s add it up for a typical 100-host AVD deployment:
| Cost Category | Annual Cost |
|---|---|
| Time spent on scaling | £9,000-18,000 (180 hours × £50-100/hr) |
| Suboptimal scaling | £12,000+ (10% inefficiency) |
| Forgotten holidays | £1,000-2,000 |
| Error recovery | £1,000-2,000 |
| Knowledge loss risk | Hard to quantify |
| Opportunity cost | Significant |
Conservative total: £23,000-34,000 per year
And this doesn’t include the intangible costs: stress, burnout, user frustration, and technical debt.
The Comparison
Now compare that to the cost of automation:
- The Smart Scaler: A fraction of manual management costs
- Implementation time: Hours, not weeks
- Ongoing effort: Minimal oversight
- Consistency: 24/7, every day, every holiday
- Optimisation: Continuous, not occasional
The ROI calculation isn’t even close.
”But We Already Have Someone Doing This”
Yes, and that person could be doing something more valuable.
IT teams are stretched thin. Every hour spent on repetitive operational tasks is an hour not spent on:
- Strategic initiatives
- Security improvements
- User support
- Innovation
Automation doesn’t replace your team — it frees them to work on things that actually need human intelligence.
”But What If the Automation Goes Wrong?”
Valid concern. But consider:
- Automation makes consistent, predictable decisions
- Humans make variable, sometimes unpredictable decisions
- Automation can be monitored and alerted
- Human processes have single points of failure
- Automation maintains audit trails
- Manual changes are often undocumented
Well-designed automation is actually more reliable than manual processes.
Making the Case for Automation
If you need to justify automation to stakeholders, frame it this way:
Current state: We’re paying £30,000+/year in hidden costs for manual AVD management, plus consuming IT staff time that could be better spent elsewhere.
Proposed state: Automated scaling that costs a fraction of this, eliminates hidden costs, frees staff time, and provides better, more consistent results.
ROI: Payback in months, ongoing savings for years.
The numbers make the decision obvious.
Getting Started
Ready to stop the hidden bleeding of manual management?
- Audit your current state — How much time does manual management actually consume?
- Calculate your hidden costs — Use the framework above
- Evaluate automation options — Look for tools that fit your needs
- Start small — Automate one host pool and measure results
- Scale up — Expand automation as you see results
Or simply try The Smart Scaler and see how much you could be saving.
The true cost of manual management isn’t what you’re spending — it’s what you could be saving. Start your free trial and let automation do the heavy lifting.